ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2025
Continuous versus Intermittent Use of Tear Substitutes in Patients Treated with Anti-VEGF for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The TREDIA Study.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06174181 (Preventive TREatment of Dry Eye in Patients Receiving Repeated Intravitreal Injections for Age-related Macular Degeneration), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Preventive TREatment of Dry Eye in Patients Receiving Repeated Intravitreal Injections for Age-related Macular Degeneration
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this prospective randomized bicenter study was to compare the effects of continuous versus intermittent use of tear substitutes on the ocular surface and dry eye symptoms in patients receiving repeated and frequent intravitreal injections (IVIs) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).
methodsPatients with nAMD treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) for more than 1 year at 4-8-week intervals were included. The intermittent treatment group received standard 1.5% povidone artificial tears for three days after each IVI, while the continuous treatment group received an ophthalmic lubricant emulsion with 0.18% sodium hyaluronate four times a day throughout the study. The primary endpoint was the mean change in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score between baseline and the day of the fourth IVI. Secondary endpoints included the Schirmer test score, tear break-up time (TBUT), and Oxford staining score.
resultsSixty-five patients with mean age of 83.1 ± 6.0 years who had previously received a mean number of 28.5 ± 20.3 IVIs were included. The mean OSDI score change from baseline was -6.6 ± 13.5 points in the continuous treatment group versus +0.6 ± 13.7 points in the intermittent treatment group (p = 0.04). No significant differences in Schirmer test score, TBUT, and Oxford score were found between the groups.
conclusionsContinuous use of tear substitutes in patients with nAMD receiving repeated and frequent IVIs could be beneficial in improving dry eye symptoms, as shown by a significant improvement in OSDI scores in our study, despite no substantial changes in other ocular surface metrics. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06174181.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.