ArticleLasers in medical science2025
Efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy for bacterial reduction in endodontics of primary teeth: an in vitro study.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Different adjunct methods have been proposed to reduce microorganisms during endodontic treatment. This study aimed to evaluate microbial reduction in vitro in the root canals of extracted primary teeth contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC), following antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT). Twenty-one root canals of primary teeth, decals from the repository of a research group were contaminated and divided into three groups (7 roots per group): the control group (CG) underwent chemical-mechanical preparation (CMP) with mechanized instrumentation and smear layer removal; intervention group 1 (G1) underwent aPDT without CMP; and intervention group 2 (G2) underwent CMP followed by aPDT. Significant bacterial reductions were observed across all the groups (p = 0.001), with final mean bacterial loads statistically lower than the initial mean levels (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney test). The G2 group demonstrated the highest mean microbial reduction, with 5 roots achieving complete bacterial elimination (100% reduction). Comparatively, the mean colony-forming unit (CFU) reduction values in G2 were comparable to those in CG (p = 0.318), and both were significantly higher than in G1 (p = 0.001 for CG vs. G1; p = 0.001 for G2 vs. G1). Under the conditions tested, aPDT served as an effective adjunct technique to pulpectomy, but did not outperform conventional pulpectomy performed alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40691383What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.