ArticleScientific reports2025
Differences in perceived sensitivity to air pollution between smokers and non-smokers during a heavy haze episode in Northeast China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health Under Haze: Symptom Burden Among Adult Outpatients During the 2024-2025 Winter Smog Season in Lahore, Pakistan.Public health challenges · 2026Article
- Public responses about air quality in the world's ten most populous countries.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
China experienced a catastrophic haze episode in January 2013 (2013JHE), no study has compared the prevalence of acute respiratory symptoms between smokers and non-smokers in 2013JHE. A rapid cross-sectional assessment of perceived air pollution and the prevalence of coughing, phlegm, and wheezing was conducted among 4303 adults sampled from three cities in Liaoning. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for the prevalence of coughing, phlegm, and wheezing. A path analysis was performed to test the relationships between number of cigarettes smoked daily, perceived air pollution score (PAPS), protective behavior score (PBS), and irritating feeling score (IFS). Among the participants, 26.3% felt irritated; 26.9% had acute respiratory symptoms; 22.9% had coughing; 20.2% had throat pain. The ORs for coughing, phlegm, and wheezing were all significantly increased among individuals with a history of respiratory disease, PAPS, PBS, and IFS. However, the ORs for coughing and wheezing were borderline significantly decreased among smokers, and the number of cigarettes smoked daily was negatively associated with PAPS and PBS in the path model. The 2013JHE had a serious impact local residents and significantly increased the prevalence of acute respiratory symptoms. Non-smokers and residents with a history of respiratory disease appear to be more susceptible sub-populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.