ReviewNature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology2025
Black-White disparities across the colorectal cancer care continuum in the USA.
Review in Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Signaling Pathways, Clinical Features, Screening, Diagnosis, and Management.MedComm · 2026Review
- Medicaid Expansion and Mortality Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Guided Analysis of WNT Pathway Alterations: Associations with Genomic Burden and Survival Across African American and Non-Hispanic White Populations, Age Groups, and FOLFOX Treatment in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Fecal Immunochemical Test and Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Real-World Practice: A Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Trends and disparities in neoplasm-related mortality with death-certificate-documented protein-energy malnutrition in the United States, 1999-2024: a CDC WONDER multiple cause of death study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Colorectal Cancer: Differential Gene Expression and In Vitro Response to 5-Fluorouracil, Novel Fluoropyrimidine F10, and Potential Synergy with Lupeol.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a substantial public health challenge globally and is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the USA. Despite advances in screening and treatment, disparities in CRC outcomes persist, especially among Black individuals in the USA, who face higher CRC incidence and mortality and lower survival compared with White individuals. Inequities are largely attributed to social determinants of health (SDOH), such as access to health care, socioeconomic conditions and systemic inequities. In this Review, we examine Black-White disparities in CRC outcomes across the CRC care continuum in the USA, highlighting contributing modifiable (non-biological) and non-modifiable (biological) risk factors. We also discuss successful interventions that have reduced or eliminated disparities. Existing evidence suggests that Black-White differences in CRC screening participation, CRC incidence and CRC mortality can be resolved. Future efforts must emphasize improving access to screening and guideline-concordant treatment to achieve progress in the near term while addressing the underlying and historical SDOH that drive inequities to eliminate disparities in the long term. The Review underscores the need for sustained investment in addressing both immediate and systemic barriers to CRC screening and care in Black communities to eliminate disparities in CRC outcomes and improve the overall health of the nation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40691299What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.