ArticlePediatric research2026
Characterization and diagnosis of feeding difficulties in full-term neonates in NICUs: a multicenter study.
Article in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of factors affecting postoperative feeding intolerance in neonates following intestinal surgery.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Pediatrics advances in 2024: choices in allergy, cardiology, critical care, endocrinology, gastroenterology, immunology, infectious diseases, neonatology, nephrology, neurology, nutrition, palliative care respiratory tract illnesses, and social media.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFeeding difficulties significantly impact neonatal well-being. This study explores the clinical characteristics, etiologies, and diagnostic practices for full-term neonates with feeding difficulties in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).
methodsThis retrospective cohort study recruited full-term infants admitted to NICUs participating in the China Neonatal Genome Project from March 2017 to December 2021, diagnosed with feeding difficulties persisting >72 h.
resultsAmong 220 patients, the most common symptoms were poor sucking (39.5%), vomiting (22.3%), and dysphagia (14.1%). High-yield diagnostic modalities included genetic tests (83/220, 37.3%), brain imaging (70/145, 48.3%), laryngoscopy (47/54, 87.0%), and muscle biopsy (12/28, 42.9%). A definitive etiology was identified through clinical evaluation in 100 cases (45.5%), 48 of which (21.8%) were subsequently confirmed by genetic testing. In an additional 35 cases (15.9%), genetic results contributed to diagnostic clarification or revision. Compared to neonates without genetic disorders, the 83 patients with genetic disorders were more likely to have persistent feeding difficulties, reduced muscle tone, craniofacial deformities, urinary and reproductive system malformations, and a need for invasive respiratory support (P < 0.05 for all).
conclusionIdentifiable etiologies were found in over 60% cases, with genetic disorders representing a significant subset. Selective genetic testing and targeted diagnostic strategies are essential for managing feeding difficulties in this vulnerable population. IMPACT: Feeding difficulties in full-term neonates admitted to NICUs remain under-recognized compared to those in preterm infants. This study provides a comprehensive overview of their clinical features and underlying etiologies, highlighting a substantial proportion with identifiable causes, including genetic and non-genetic factors (e.g., neuromuscular and gastrointestinal). By outlining the diagnostic yield of key modalities and their clinical relevance, our findings offer practical guidance for early evaluation of feeding difficulties in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40691290What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.