ArticleScientific reports2025
Next-generation sequencing of CCR5, CXCR4, and IFNAR1 variants in relation to HIV-1 disease progression and ART response.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeted Sequencing and Haplotype Analysis of Voltage-Gated Potassium Channel Genes Reveal a Potential Association ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Role of the CCR5 Receptor in Neuropathic Pain Modulation: Current Insights and Therapeutic Implications.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
HIV, which causes acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), invades the host cell via the CD4 receptor and CCR5 or CXCR4 co-receptors. Interferons induced early in HIV infection induce an antiviral defense mechanism through IFNAR signaling. Our study aimed to examine the relationship between CCR5, CXCR4, and IFNAR1 gene variations as a risk factor in HIV + patients and their response to their clinical parameters. Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) was used to perform molecular genotyping analysis of the CCR5, CXCR4, and IFNAR1 genes in genomic DNA from 22 HIV + patients and 25 healthy individuals as controls. We detected 13 rare mutations in the study, including 3 missense, 1 synonymous, 2 5'UTR, 4 3'UTR, and 1 frameshift variation. We also analyzed 6 common variants in the IFNAR1 and CXCR4 genes. HIV + patients carrying the homozygous TT genotype of the IFNAR1 intronic rs2856973:T > A variant had higher CD4 + T cell counts compared with patients carrying the TA + AA genotypes of the rs2856973 variant in the naive and first month of the ART (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Similarly, participants receiving ART with a TT genotype of rs2856973:T > A showed a significantly higher CD4 + T cell count in the third month (p = 0.001). Patients carrying the homozygous wild-type genotype of the CXCR4 intronic rs2680880:A > T SNP had lower CD4 + T cell count compared with subjects carrying the AT + TT mutant genotypes of rs2680880:A > T in the naive and first-month period (p = 0.015 and p = 0.025, respectively). Our results demonstrate that intronic variations in the IFNAR1 rs2856973:T > A and CXCR4 rs2680880:A > T genes can contribute to modifications in HIV progression and CD4 + T recovery under ART.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.