ArticleScientific reports2025
Natural Language Processing framework for identifying abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs using unstructured electronic health records.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging Large Language Models for Automated Extraction of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Features from Radiology Reports.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Adult Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery: Real-World Deployments and Outcomes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient identification for national registries often relies upon clinician recognition of cases or retrospective searches using potentially inaccurate clinical codes, leading to incomplete data capture and inefficiencies. Natural Language Processing (NLP) offers a promising solution by automating analysis of electronic health records (EHRs). This study aimed to develop NLP models for identifying and classifying abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repairs from unstructured EHRs, demonstrating a proof-of-concept for automated patient identification in registries like the National Vascular Registry. Using the MIMIC-IV-Note dataset, a multi-tiered approach was developed to identify vascular patients (Task 1), AAA repairs (Task 2), and classify repairs as primary or revision (Task 3). Four NLP models were trained and evaluated using 4870 annotated records: scispaCy, BERT-base, Bio-clinicalBERT, and a scispaCy/Bio-clinicalBERT ensemble. Models were compared using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The scispaCy model demonstrated the fastest training (2 min/epoch) and inference times (2.87 samples/sec). For Task 1, scispaCy and ensemble models achieved the highest accuracy (0.97). In Task 2, all models performed exceptionally well, with ensemble, scispaCy, and Bio-clinicalBERT models achieving 0.99 accuracy and 1.00 AUC. For Task 3, Bio-clinicalBERT and the ensemble model achieved an AUC of 1.00, with Bio-clinicalBERT displaying the best overall accuracy (0.98). This study demonstrates that NLP models can accurately identify and classify AAA repair cases from unstructured EHRs, suggesting significant potential for automating patient identification in vascular surgery and other medical registries, reducing administra.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.