ArticleScientific reports2025
Passive acoustic monitoring reveals seasonal patterns in European green toad calling activity but fails to accurately reflect population abundance.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Calling Phenology of Two Frog Species in South Korean Rice Paddies Using Automated Call Detection.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amphibians are among the most endangered groups of vertebrates worldwide; therefore, effective population monitoring is crucial for understanding the factors driving these unfavourable trends. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of fully automated passive acoustic monitoring in estimating the distribution and population size of the European green toad (Bufotes viridis)-an anuran species in which males vocalize intensively during the breeding season. We conducted visual counts with human observers, recorded the soundscape using autonomous sound recorders, applied automatic call detection, and calculated soundscape complexity using acoustic indices adjusted to the frequency range of European green toad vocalizations. Our algorithm generated a calling intensity index, which detected 36% of calls with 96% precision. The calling intensity index showed a significant correlation with the number of calls detected manually (r = 0.727). Additionally, we found moderate but significant correlations between acoustic indices (Acoustic Complexity Index and Bioacoustic Index) and both the manually and automatically detected call counts. The calling intensity index and acoustic indices did not significantly correlate with the number of males counted by human observer, but they reflected the phenological changes in species' reproductive activity. Our study demonstrates that passive acoustic monitoring enables the assessment of presence and distribution of the European green toad, as well as daily and seasonal patterns in calling activity. However, due to the specific biology and ecology of the species, calling intensity alone is insufficient for accurately estimating male abundance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.