Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40691200›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Accuracy and acceptability of self-sampling HPV testing in cervical cancer screening: a population-based study in rural Yunnan, China.

Rufei Duan, Hongying Yang, Xiuwei Zhai, Jing Yu, Chen Lu, Wenmin Yang, Tingfeng Long, Yan Dao, Gaofeng Li, Yongchun Zhou and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rufei Duan *Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, No.519 Kunzhou Road, Xishan District, Kunming, 650118, Yunnan, China.
Hongying Yang *Department of Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Xiuwei ZhaiDepartment of Medical Laboratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Jing YuDepartment of Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Chen LuDepartment of Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Wenmin YangDepartment of Gynecology, Shuangjiang Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Lincang, Yunnan, China.
Tingfeng LongDepartment of Teaching Management, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Yan DaoDepartment of Gynecology, Shuangjiang Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Lincang, Yunnan, China.
Gaofeng LiDepartment of Cancer Prevention and Control, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, No.519 Kunzhou Road, Xishan District, Kunming, 650118, Yunnan, China.
Yongchun ZhouDepartment of Cancer Prevention and Control, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, No.519 Kunzhou Road, Xishan District, Kunming, 650118, Yunnan, China.
Hongyi ZhengKey Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, KIZ-CUHK Joint Laboratory of Bioresources and Molecular Research in Common Diseases, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Jiaochang Road, Wuhua District, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Fanghui ZhaoDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yong-Tang Zheng *Key Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, KIZ-CUHK Joint Laboratory of Bioresources and Molecular Research in Common Diseases, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Jiaochang Road, Wuhua District, Kunming, Yunnan, China. zhengyt@mail.kiz.ac.cn.
Yunchao Huang *Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, No.519 Kunzhou Road, Xishan District, Kunming, 650118, Yunnan, China. huangych2001@aliyun.com.

Funding

Basic Research Project of Yunnan Provincial Department of Science and Technology 202301AT070237"Famous Doctor" Special Project of Ten Thousand People Plan of Yunnan Province CZ0096Innovative Research Team of Yunnan Province 202305AS350020The Joint Special Funds for the Department of Science and Technology of Yunnan Province Kunming Medical University 202301AY070001-245Yunnan Province Medical Discipline Reserve Talent Training Program H-2024010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the accuracy and acceptability of self-sampling samples for HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in rural Yunnan of China. In 2022, 3000 women aged 17-69 were recruited and provided self-sampling vaginal samples alongside provider-sampling samples for HPV DNA and E6/E7 mRNA testing, as well as artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted cytology. Women who tested positive for any high-risk HPV DNA or mRNA, or who displayed cytology abnormalities, were recalled for a colposcopy examination and biopsied when necessary. The accuracy of these tests in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2 +) and CIN3 + was evaluated. The sensitivity of the HPV DNA test for self-sampling was 96.2%, compared to 92.3% for provider-sampling, 73.1% for the mRNA test, and 53.9% for AI-assisted cytology in detecting CIN2 + . The specificity was 83.9% for self-sampling HPV DNA test, 86.4% for provider-sampling HPV DNA test, 91.4% for the mRNA test, and 94.2% for AI-assisted cytology. The area under the curve (AUC) values for these screening methods were 0.90, 0.90, 0.82, and 0.74, respectively. Only 37% of participants preferred the self-sampling model, with lower preference observed among older women, those from rare minority groups, those with lower education levels, and who displayed limited knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding cervical cancer screening. Self-sampling HPV DNA testing demonstrated comparable clinical accuracy to provider-sampling test and were more accurate than that of mRNA test and AI-assisted cytology. Self-sampling HPV testing offers a promising screening strategy in rural Yunnan China. Applicable health education is urgently needed to improve the acceptability of 'self-sampling' model among the target population.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedChinaDNA, ViralFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRural PopulationVaginal SmearsYoung AdultDNA, ViralAcceptabilityAccuracyCervical cancer screeningHPVSelf-sampling

Identifiers

PMID40691200
PMCPMC12279988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.