Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40691165›Full record

ArticleNPJ vaccines2025

Global vaccine confidence trends among adults above and below age 65.

Bei Liu, Xiyu Zhang, Yongqiang Lai, Tao Sun, Chao Wang, Tianshuo Zhao, Sihui Zhang, Baoguo Shi, Ye Li, Fuqiang Cui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Global vaccine development.Nature medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bei Liu *Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Xiyu Zhang *Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yongqiang Lai *Research Center of Health Policy and Management, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Tao SunSchool of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Chao WangVaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Tianshuo ZhaoVaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Sihui ZhangVaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Baoguo ShiDepartment of Economics, School of Economics, Minzu University of China, Beijing, China. bgshi2008@hotmail.com.
Ye LiSchool of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China. liye8459@163.com.
Fuqiang CuiVaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China. cuifuq@bjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China,China 72104005National Social Science Fund of China 22BGL246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study is interested in global vaccine confidence because it directly impacts vaccination rates and public health outcomes, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, due to the unique vulnerabilities to vaccine-preventable diseases, misinformation, and access to health information among adults aged 65 and older, understanding vaccine confidence in this population is crucial for developing targeted interventions and improving vaccination rates. The current research is limited by single-country surveys and cross-sectional designs, providing limited insights into these issues. We compared the vaccine confidence between the population over 65 and under 65 in terms of vaccine safety, effectiveness, compatibility with religious beliefs, and importance to children. We employed a hierarchical logistic model, and compared human development index (HDI) values to investigate determinants of vaccine confidence. Vaccine confidence increased between 2015 and 2019, but decreased between 2019 and 2022 across most global regions, exhibiting an inverted U-shaped trend. Population over 65 in high-income countries was more likely to agree on the safety, effectiveness, importance to children, and compatibility of vaccines with religious beliefs than those under 65, with agreement levels exceeding 80% for most aspects. Gender, education, income, and religion influenced vaccine attitudes among adults aged 65 and older. Countries with an HDI exceeding 0.9 consistently demonstrated positive trends in vaccine confidence. This relationship between HDI and vaccine confidence underscores the importance of comprehensive societal development in shaping attitudes toward vaccination. These findings can help develop targeted interventions and policies to improve vaccination rates among older adults.

Identifiers

PMID40691165
PMCPMC12280150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.