ArticleNPJ genomic medicine2025
Sequencing validates deep learning models for EHR-based detection of Noonan syndrome in pediatric patients.
Article in NPJ genomic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Knowledge graph visualization and retrospective analysis of genetic research on pediatric cardiomyopathy (2000-2024).Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advanced diagnostic tools, early detection of rare genetic conditions like Noonan syndrome (NS) remains challenging. We evaluated a deep learning model's real-world performance in identifying potential NS cases using electronic health record (EHR) data, validated through genetic sequencing and clinical assessment. The model analyzed 92,428 patients, identifying 171 high-risk individuals (score > 0.8) who underwent comprehensive review. Among these, 86 had prior genetic diagnoses, including three NS cases diagnosed during the study period. Genetic sequencing of remaining patients identified two additional NS cases with pathogenic variants. The model achieved 2.92% precision and 99.82% specificity. While precision was lower than prior validation (33.3%), this reflected expected differences in disease prevalence rather than model degradation. NS-associated phenotypes were enriched among high-risk patients, and trajectory analysis showed potential for earlier identification, highlighting both promise and limitations of EHR-based computational screening tools.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.