Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40690936›Full record

ArticleDeutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2025

[Proportion of women on the executive boards and committees of 183 professional associations of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF)].

Uwe Janssens, Louisa Jahnke, Teresa Deffner, Monika Nothacker, Florian Hoffmann

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Uwe JanssensSt.-Antonius-Hospital, Eschweiler, GERMANY.
Louisa JahnkeKlinik für Anästhesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Stiftungsklinikum PROSELIS gGmbH Prosper-Hospital Recklinghausen, Recklinghausen, Deutschland.
Teresa DeffnerOperative Intensivstationen, Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland.
Monika NothackerAWMF-Institut für Medizinisches Wissensmanagement, Berlin, Deutschland.
Florian HoffmannKinderklinik und Kinderpoliklinik im Dr. von Haunerschen Kinderspital am LMU Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing proportion of women in medical studentship and medical practice contrasts with their under-represented role in leadership positions in medical professional associations in Germany. Against this background, the proportion of women in top positions of medical professional associations in Germany has been analysed.A total of 1460 individuals were counted in the analysis of the composition of the boards/presidia of the 183 professional societies. The proportion of women on the boards/executive committees was 32.6%. Of the 183 professional societies, 47 (25.7%) were led by a woman as president. 72 (39.3%) women served as vice presidents. Only 39 (21.3%) professional societies had a proportion of women on the boards/executive committees ≥50%.There is a significant imbalance of female leadership positions in medical professional associations in Germany. To address this inequality, a strategy with multiple initiatives is needed that includes both career development programmes such as mentoring and the design of congress participation to ensure a balanced gender representation.

Indexed as

Governing BoardLeadershipPhysicians, WomenSocieties, MedicalSocieties, ScientificFemaleGermanyHumans

Identifiers

PMID40690936
PMCPMC12401619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.