ArticleLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids2025
Adsorption Kinetics: Classical, Fractal, or Fractional?
Article in Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Metalloporphyrin-based hybrid photocatalyst for bisphenol A degradation: kinetics, HRMS-based analysis of transformation products, and toxicity assessment.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Realistic and sustainable phosphate adsorption using intercalant-engineered exfoliated serpentinite: mechanistic insights and real-water validation.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Article
- Tetracycline removal from an aqueous solution using bimetallic-impregnated activated carbon synthesized via one-step dry-pyrolysis of hawthorn kernels.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adsorption-limited kinetics may be described by phenomenological pseudo-order models. Such models leverage on the general principle that the rate of change of the adsorbed material depends on some power of its concentration, and their solutions provide the quantity of adsorbed molecules per unit mass of the sorbent material as a function of time. The assumptions made about how the solute molecules (adsorbents) are distributed around the sorbent material and whether or not diffusion effects are present are crucial for defining the rate of change. In the first case, the homogeneous uniform distribution of solute molecules and the absence of diffusion effects are well-described by classical modeling (integer-order derivatives). In the second case, fractal modeling arises from a departure from homogeneous uniform distribution, time is apparently contracted, and diffusion effects are still absent. In the third case, deviation from both conditions leads to fractional modeling; unlike fractal modeling, there are memory effects that exert an action on a limited number of process steps. We present briefly solutions for various classical and fractal kinetic models that describe adsorption. For the first time, we present adsorption kinetics under the framework of fractional calculus. In particular, we provide detailed expressions for pseudo-first-order fractional kinetics, while for higher orders, recursive relations amenable to numerical treatment are given. Application of each model is discussed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.