Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40690886›Full record

ArticleLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids2025

Adsorption Kinetics: Classical, Fractal, or Fractional?

Evangelos Bakalis, Francesco Zerbetto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Evangelos BakalisDipartimento di Chimica "G. Ciamician", Università di Bologna, V. P. Gobetti 85, 40129 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0036-7887
Francesco ZerbettoDipartimento di Chimica "G. Ciamician", Università di Bologna, V. P. Gobetti 85, 40129 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2419-057X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adsorption-limited kinetics may be described by phenomenological pseudo-order models. Such models leverage on the general principle that the rate of change of the adsorbed material depends on some power of its concentration, and their solutions provide the quantity of adsorbed molecules per unit mass of the sorbent material as a function of time. The assumptions made about how the solute molecules (adsorbents) are distributed around the sorbent material and whether or not diffusion effects are present are crucial for defining the rate of change. In the first case, the homogeneous uniform distribution of solute molecules and the absence of diffusion effects are well-described by classical modeling (integer-order derivatives). In the second case, fractal modeling arises from a departure from homogeneous uniform distribution, time is apparently contracted, and diffusion effects are still absent. In the third case, deviation from both conditions leads to fractional modeling; unlike fractal modeling, there are memory effects that exert an action on a limited number of process steps. We present briefly solutions for various classical and fractal kinetic models that describe adsorption. For the first time, we present adsorption kinetics under the framework of fractional calculus. In particular, we provide detailed expressions for pseudo-first-order fractional kinetics, while for higher orders, recursive relations amenable to numerical treatment are given. Application of each model is discussed.

Identifiers

PMID40690886
PMCPMC12333429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.