Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40690835›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology2025

Predicting ADC map quality from T2-weighted MRI: A deep learning approach for early quality assessment to assist point-of-care.

Jeffrey R Brender, Mitsuki Ota, Nathan Nguyen, Joshua W Ford, Shun Kishimoto, Stephanie A Harmon, Bradford J Wood, Peter A Pinto, Murali Cherukuri Krishna, Peter L Choyke and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jeffrey R BrenderRadiation Biology Branch, NCI, Bethesda, MD, United States; Molecular Imaging Branch, NCI, Bethesda, MD, United States. Electronic address: jeffrey.brender@nih.gov.
Mitsuki OtaRadiation Biology Branch, NCI, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Nathan NguyenRadiation Biology Branch, NCI, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Joshua W FordRadiation Biology Branch, NCI, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Shun KishimotoRadiation Biology Branch, NCI, Bethesda, MD, United States; Center for Interventional Oncology, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, NIH, United States.
Stephanie A HarmonMolecular Imaging Branch, NCI, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Bradford J WoodCenter for Interventional Oncology, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, NIH, United States.
Peter A PintoUrologic Oncology Branch, NCI, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Murali Cherukuri KrishnaRadiation Biology Branch, NCI, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Peter L ChoykeMolecular Imaging Branch, NCI, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Baris TurkbeyMolecular Imaging Branch, NCI, Bethesda, MD, United States.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePoor quality prostate MRI images compromise diagnostic accuracy, with diffusion-weighted imaging and the resulting apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps being particularly vulnerable. These maps are critical for prostate cancer diagnosis, yet current methods relying on standardizing technical parameters fail to consistently ensure image quality. We propose a novel deep learning approach to predict low-quality ADC maps using T2-weighted (T2W) images, enabling real-time corrective interventions during imaging. MATERIALS AND

methodsA multi-site dataset of T2W images and ADC maps from 486 patients, spanning 62 external clinics and in-house imaging, was retrospectively analyzed. A neural network was trained to classify ADC map quality as "diagnostic" or "non-diagnostic" based solely on T2W images. Rectal cross-sectional area measurements were evaluated as an interpretable metric for susceptibility-induced distortions.

resultsAnalysis revealed limited correlation between individual acquisition parameters and image quality, with horizontal phase encoding significant for T2 imaging (p < 0.001, AUC = 0.6735) and vertical resolution for ADC maps (p = 0.006, AUC = 0.6348). By contrast, the neural network achieved robust performance for ADC map quality prediction from T2 images, with 83 % sensitivity and 90 % negative predictive value in multicenter validation, comparable to single-site models using ADC maps directly. Remarkably, it generalized well to unseen in-house data (94 ± 2 % accuracy). Rectal cross-sectional area correlated with ADC quality (AUC = 0.65), offering a simple, interpretable metric.

conclusionThe probability of low quality, uninterpretable ADC maps can be inferred early in the imaging process by a neural network approach, allowing corrective action to be employed.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsQuality Assurance, Health CareAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityADC mapDeep learningImage qualityMRIProstateQuality assuranceQuality control

Identifiers

PMID40690835
PMCPMC12907294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.