ArticleEuropean journal of radiology2025
Predicting ADC map quality from T2-weighted MRI: A deep learning approach for early quality assessment to assist point-of-care.
Article in European journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning model based on MRI-derived microvascular network simulation parameters for noninvasive assessment of lymphovascular invasion in rectal cancer patients.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Prostate MRI: Addressing Current Limitations Through Emerging Technologies.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePoor quality prostate MRI images compromise diagnostic accuracy, with diffusion-weighted imaging and the resulting apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps being particularly vulnerable. These maps are critical for prostate cancer diagnosis, yet current methods relying on standardizing technical parameters fail to consistently ensure image quality. We propose a novel deep learning approach to predict low-quality ADC maps using T2-weighted (T2W) images, enabling real-time corrective interventions during imaging. MATERIALS AND
methodsA multi-site dataset of T2W images and ADC maps from 486 patients, spanning 62 external clinics and in-house imaging, was retrospectively analyzed. A neural network was trained to classify ADC map quality as "diagnostic" or "non-diagnostic" based solely on T2W images. Rectal cross-sectional area measurements were evaluated as an interpretable metric for susceptibility-induced distortions.
resultsAnalysis revealed limited correlation between individual acquisition parameters and image quality, with horizontal phase encoding significant for T2 imaging (p < 0.001, AUC = 0.6735) and vertical resolution for ADC maps (p = 0.006, AUC = 0.6348). By contrast, the neural network achieved robust performance for ADC map quality prediction from T2 images, with 83 % sensitivity and 90 % negative predictive value in multicenter validation, comparable to single-site models using ADC maps directly. Remarkably, it generalized well to unseen in-house data (94 ± 2 % accuracy). Rectal cross-sectional area correlated with ADC quality (AUC = 0.65), offering a simple, interpretable metric.
conclusionThe probability of low quality, uninterpretable ADC maps can be inferred early in the imaging process by a neural network approach, allowing corrective action to be employed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.