Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40690761›Full record

ReviewBlood advances2025

Immunoglobulin prophylaxis should be initiated after bispecific antibody therapy in multiple myeloma, regardless of IgG levels.

Rahul Banerjee, Meera Mohan, Kai Rejeski, Benjamin R Puliafito, Diana D Cirstea, Gurbakhash Kaur, Shonali Midha, Georgia J McCaughan, Nikhil M Kumar, Nikita Mehra and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Patient preferences for treatment‑free intervals in multiple myeloma: mixed‑methods insights on monitoring trade‑offs and supportive care improvements.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rahul BanerjeeClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0003-3781-5441
Meera MohanDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.ORCID 0000-0002-6913-6526
Kai RejeskiDepartment of Medicine III, Hematology/Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Benjamin R PuliafitoDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0003-3972-6362
Diana D CirsteaDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-5719-581X
Gurbakhash KaurDepartment of Medicine, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New Nork, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-2510-6536
Shonali MidhaDepartment of Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Georgia J McCaughanDepartment of Haematology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4838-9022
Nikhil M KumarDepartment of Medicine, Fortis Memorial Research Institute, Gurugram, India.ORCID 0009-0002-6375-9981
Nikita MehraDepartment of Medicine, Cachar Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Silchar, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4605-7470
Bhausaheb BagalDepartment of Medicine, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9754-0182
Noopur S RajeDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractBispecific antibodies (bsAbs), such as teclistamab, elranatamab, linvoseltamab, and talquetamab, have impressive efficacy in multiple myeloma (MM) but come with substantial infectious risks that do not dissipate over time. Immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT), which includes IV and subcutaneous (SC) immunoglobulins, may lower these risks. In this viewpoint, we contrast primary IgRT prophylaxis (initiation regardless of IgG levels) with preemptive IgRT treatment (initiation only once IgG levels fall below a certain threshold) in this setting. We make evidence-based arguments for primary prophylaxis as a safer and simpler approach than preemptive IgG-guided IgRT. We also discuss strategies to improve the cost-effectiveness of IV and SC immunoglobulins across the world. Given the overwhelmingly favorable benefit-risk profile of IgRT, coupled with the limitations inherent to IgG measurements in MM, withholding IgRT access based on arbitrary IgG thresholds is neither scientifically sound nor clinically appropriate for patients with MM who are receiving bsAb therapy.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificImmunoglobulin GMultiple MyelomaHumansAntibodies, BispecificImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID40690761
PMCPMC12466225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.