ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025
Optimizing the breadth of SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibodies in vivo and in silico.
Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anti-SARS-CoV-2 response in alveolar blood sample and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of individuals vaccinated with inactivated COVID-19 vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Observation of redistribution for local conformational dynamics in cross-reactive antibody design.Journal of biochemistry · 2026Article
- Differential functional immune recall across homologous and heterologous COVID-19 vaccination regimens.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, the ongoing arms race between mutating viruses and human antibodies has revealed several novel strategies by which antibodies adapt to viral escape. While SARS-CoV-2 viruses exhibit high variability in epitopes targeted by neutralizing antibodies, certain epitopes remain conserved owing to their essential roles on viral fitness. Antibodies can acquire broadly neutralizing activity by targeting these vulnerable sites through affinity-based somatic evolution of immunoglobulin genes. Notably, the specificity encoded in antibody germline genes also plays a fundamental role in acquiring the breadth. In-depth genetic and structural analyses of the antibody repertoires have uncovered multiple strategies for adapting to evolving targets. The integration of large-scale antibody datasets with computational approaches increases the feasibility and efficiency of designing broadly neutralizing antibody therapeutics from ancestral antibody clones with limited initial efficacy. In this review, we discuss strategies to optimize antibody breadth for the development of broadly neutralizing antibody therapeutics and vaccine antigens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.