ArticleOccupational medicine (Oxford, England)2025
Silica exposures and silicosis incidence in the Western Australia mining industry.
Article in Occupational medicine (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Respirable Dust Exposure in Western Australian Mining: Trends, Variability, and Implications for Occupational Health.American journal of industrial medicine · 2026Article
- Assessing Compliance with Evolving Exposure Standards: Respirable Crystalline Silica (RCS) Exposure in Western Australian Mining.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSilicosis has historically been an issue in the Western Australian mining industry.
aimsTo determine the magnitude of exposures to atmospheric respirable crystalline silica (RCS) in mine workers recorded between 1986 and 2023 and if those exposures risk health effects.
methodsWe used descriptive statistics to compare RCS exposures in mining job types. We identified high exposure occupations and modelled their resulting lung silica burden using known toxicokinetic parameters. These were compared with critical lung silica burdens for alveolar inflammation, soft macules, fibrosis and progressive massive fibrosis. We compared the miners' RCS exposures with historical silicosis cases in Western Australia's mine workers.
resultsThe geometric mean of more than 130 000 RCS results between 1986 and 2023 was 0.008 mg/m3. Exposures in exploration jobs were higher than in jobs on established mine operations (0.013 vs 0.007 mg/m3). Overall, exploration drilling assistant jobs and laboratory work were the two highest exposed cohorts, and modelling of steady state lung burden predicted 7.5 and 5.7 mg/lung, respectively, values an order of magnitude less than that associated with inflammation, and two orders of magnitude less than that associated with fibrosis. There have been 4 confirmed and 3 other possible cases of silicosis in more than 2 million person-years of mine work in WA since 1986.
conclusionsThe low incidence of silicosis in the WA mining industry over the past 20 years is consistent with the estimated low silica lung burdens resulting from work-related exposures, which are significantly lower than the silica lung burdens typically associated with silicosis in the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.