ArticlePloS one2025
An illustration of multi-class roc analysis for predicting internet addiction among university students.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a machine learning-based clinical decision support tool for stratifying intravenous medication risk in hospitalized patients with heart failure.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Predicting Suicide Attempt Trends in Youth: A Machine Learning Analysis Using Google Trends and Historical Data.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Identifying influential determinants of women's empowerment in Bangladesh using machine learning algorithms.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The internet is one of the essential tools today, and its impact is particularly felt among university students. Internet addiction (IA) has become a serious public health issue worldwide. This multi-class classification study aimed to identify the potential predictors of IA by four severity levels among university students in Bangladesh. We used cross-sectional survey data from 424 university students from different universities in Bangladesh. Data was collected using a self-reported questionnaire, along with an IA test to assess addiction levels. We identified the important features related to IA using the Boruta algorithm. Predictions were made using different machine learning (ML) (decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), support vector machines (SVMs), and logistic regression (LR)) models. Their performance was assessed using confusion matrix parameters, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves, and k-fold cross-validation techniques for multi-class classification problems. The prevalence of severe IA was 3.77% among the participating university students in Bangladesh from July 15 to July 22, 2024. University students' backgrounds, depression, anxiety, stress, participation in physical activity, misbehaving with family members, memory loss symptoms, and being COVID-19-positive were selected as significant features for predicting IA. Overall, the RF (accuracy = 0.531, sensitivity = 0.200, specificity = 0.986, precision = 1.00, k-fold accuracy = 0.4858, micro-average area under curve (AUC) = 0.7798) more accurately predicted IA compared to other ML techniques. The ML framework for multi-class classification study can reveal significant risk factors and predict this behavioral addiction more precisely. It can help policymakers, stakeholders, and families better understand the situation and prevent this severe crisis by improving policy-making strategies, promoting mental health, and establishing effective university counseling services. Therefore, raising awareness among the younger generation and their parents about the predictors of IA is important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.