ArticlePloS one2025
Quantitative modeling of mortality patterns in dogs exposed to alpha particle emitting radionuclides: Insights from competing risks and causal inference machine learning.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study employed state-of-the-art machine learning to evaluate the mortality effects of alpha-emitting radionuclides (241Am, 249Cf, 252Cf, 238Pu, 239Pu, 224Ra, 226Ra, 228Th) on 2,576 dogs, factoring in radioactivity levels, composition, administration method (injection or inhalation), and age at exposure. There were 972 cancer deaths, 599 non-cancer deaths, 789 deaths from many diseases (involving several diagnoses, including both cancer and non-cancer pathologies), and 216 deaths with uncertain causes. A Random Survival Forest model for overall mortality achieved concordance scores of 0.763 and 0.745 on training and testing data subsets, respectively. A model variant with competing risks was used to investigate mortality trends over time for different disease categories. It achieved concordances of 0.814 for cancer, 0.652 for non-cancer, and 0.778 for many diseases on training data, and 0.817 for cancer, 0.651 for non-cancer, and 0.780 for many diseases on testing data. All radionuclides exhibited radiation responses for cancer, with 226Ra and 239Pu showing the strongest effects. Some responses were non-linear, with indications of saturation or downturn at high treatment quantities. For non-cancer diseases, radiation responses were generally weaker and more variable. For the many diseases endpoint, 238Pu and 239Pu demonstrated the strongest response patterns, with 239Pu exhibiting greater lethality via inhalation compared to injection.. Using a Causal Forest model, which is designed to detect causal relationships rather than just associations, we investigated the causal impact of radioactivity on dog mortality, accounting for other variables. We found a significant (p < 2 × 10-16) negative average causal effect of -1,375 days per log10 radioactivity unit on survival time. This study improves current knowledge of cancer and non-cancer mortality patterns from densely-ionizing radiation in mammals by using machine learning to analyze combined historical data on dogs exposed to different radionuclides, modeling multiple variables, nonlinear dependencies, and causal relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.