SynthesisPloS one2025
Uptake of cervical cancer screening and its determinants in Africa: Umbrella review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Female Students and Staff at a Tertiary Institution in Northern Uganda: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Leveraging sexually transmitted infection clinics for cervical cancer screening: evidence from India.Public health action · 2026Article
- Predicting knowledge of cervical cancer screening among reproductive-age women in sub-saharan africa using machine learning algorithms.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cervical Cancer Screening and Associated Factors Among Women of Reproductive Age in Sidama Regional State of Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Article
- Awareness, Cultural Beliefs, and Health-Seeking Behavior of Females in Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study in Rural South Africa.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- "My Wife's Healthcare Is my Healthcare": A Qualitative Study Exploring Family-Centered Strategies to Enhance Cervical Cancer Prevention in Northern Ghana.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical cancer is the fourth most prevalent type of cancer in women globally. Early detection and treatment of precancerous cervical lesions and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection are strongly advised to decrease the incidence of cervical cancer and death. Cervical cancer is a major public health concern in low- and middle-income nations, where screening and treatment options are constrained. Thus, the main objective of this umbrella review was to determine the pooled uptake of cervical cancer screening and its determinants in Africa.
methodsThis study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The protocol for this umbrella review was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with reference number CRD42024518297. We conduct a systematic and comprehensive search by using Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, Hinari, and Science Direct, from January 1, 2014, to September 20, 2024. The data were extracted using Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. The methodological quality of the included studies was examined using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2). The statistical analysis was carried out using STATA version 17, which includes descriptive analysis, forest plots for prevalence, funnel plot, and an Egger test to examine publication bias. A random-effects model was used to determine the pooled effect estimate. Publication bias was checked by using the funnel plot and Egger's tests.
resultsThis umbrella review included 11 systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies across Africa with a total of 143,327 study participants. The overall prevalence of cervical cancer screening practice in Africa was 20.94% (95% CI: 15.84%-26.04%). Women's level of knowledge (AOR: 3.22, 95% CI: 1.64-6.33), positive attitude toward CCS (AOR: 2.48, 95% CI: 2.18-2.81), perceived vulnerability to cervical cancer (AOR = 3.57, 95% CI: 2.75, 4.63), and history of STIs (AOR = 4.89, 95% CI: 3.14, 7.62) were significantly associated with cervical cancer screening practice. In conclusion, the combined estimate of cervical cancer screening use in Africa remains much lower (20.94%) than the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations target (70%). It indicates that there is a large gap that requires being addressed in collaboration to reduce the burden of cervical cancer and its morbidity and mortality across the continent. Therefore, healthcare professionals, policymakers, and other stakeholders shall implement effective strategies such as empowering women, improving the knowledge and attitude towards cervical cancer screening, advocacy, and expanding screening programs to all eligible women to increase utilization of cervical cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.