Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40690461›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2025

A mapping survey of digital clinical consultations in maternity care in England.

Georgia Clancy, Kerry Evans, Helen Spiby, Victoria Barrett, Candice Sunney, Catrin Evans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Georgia ClancySchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3550-6875
Kerry EvansSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Helen SpibySchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Victoria BarrettSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Candice SunneyNottingham Maternity Research Network, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Catrin EvansSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5338-2191

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many areas of healthcare are exploring the use of digital technologies with the aim of improving and expanding care to service users. In England, maternity care is currently undergoing a digital transformation in line with the National Health Service's (NHS) Long Term Plan, which seeks to enhance care delivery and accessibility through digital tools. However, there is a lack of data on the current use and practice of digital consultations across the country. This project aimed to map and explore how digital clinical consultations are currently being used by NHS maternity care services in England. An online survey was designed to capture data on current practice, guidance and procedures to address potential inequalities. The survey was distributed to each NHS Trust (n = 121) that provides maternity care (specifically to senior maternity care professionals and digital maternity leaders who could provide an overview of how digital consultations were being used where they worked). The survey was open between January and March 2024. 53 completed surveys were received representing 39 different organisations (32% of those currently providing maternity care in England). Quantitative summary statistics indicated that telephone consultations were the most commonly used digital modality across all stages of the maternity care pathway. Thematic analysis identified barriers such as a lack of staff consultation and lack of staff training on the use of digital consultations. It was uncommon for women to be asked about their consultation preferences or assessed for individual needs. In conclusion, the findings reveal significant variation in the use of digital consultations, highlighting a gap between policy intentions and practice. Key areas for improvement in the delivery and implementation of digital consultations include staff training, systems to record women's consultation preferences/needs, and more research to support digital inclusion. The findings of this survey have the potential to have applications beyond maternity care and in different geographical contexts.

Identifiers

PMID40690461
PMCPMC12279142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.