ArticlePloS one2025
Establishment of two pathomic-based machine learning models to predict CLCA1 expression in colon adenocarcinoma.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Molecular Alterations in Colorectal Cancer Using Routine H&E Whole-Slide Images.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- A multimodal approach integrating NK cell-associated gene signatures and pathomics to predict colon adenocarcinoma prognosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chloride channel accessory 1 (CLCA1) is considered a potential prognostic biomarker for colon adenocarcinoma (COAD). The objective of this research was to develop two pathomics models to predict CLCA1 expression from hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) stained pathological images and to investigate the biological mechanisms linked to pathomics features by associating the pathomics model with transcriptomic data. The prognostic value of CLCA1 in COAD was assessed based on gene transcriptome expression data. The two pathomics models were constructed to predict CLCA1 expression in COAD based on pathological image features using the random forest (RF) and XGBoost machine learning algorithms. The RF pathomics model demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.846 and 0.776 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively, and was selected for further analysis. The ability of the pathomics model to predict overall survival (OS) in COAD was determined using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. The possible biological mechanisms behind the pathomics model were explored by conducting gene set variation analysis (GSVA), immune infiltration assessment, and somatic mutation analysis. CLCA1 expression was downregulated in COAD patients and was associated with a poor prognosis (P = 0.008). Participants were categorized into high- and low-risk score groups based on the critical value of the risk score. High-risk scores were protective for OS in COAD in both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Meanwhile, GSVA enrichment analysis unveiled notable enrichment of pathways such as the epithelial-mesenchymal transition and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling in the low-risk score group. Two pathomics-based machine learning models were developed to predict CLCA1 expression from H&E stained images of COAD. A theoretical basis for interpreting the disease model was developed by comprehensively analyzing the pathomics-based models and transcriptomic data, facilitating further hypothesis-driven experimental research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.