Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40690289›Full record

Observational studyJournal of medical Internet research2025

Development and Validation of a Depression Scale for Online Assessment: Cross-Sectional Observational Study.

Minjeong Jeon, Hae-In Park, Yoorianna Son, Ji Won Hyun, Jin Young Park

Abstract readObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Minjeong Jeon *Department of Psychiatry, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yongin, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8401-0104
Hae-In Park *Department of Psychiatry, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yongin, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8051-8624
Yoorianna SonDepartment of Psychiatry, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yongin, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0016-2647
Ji Won HyunDepartment of Psychiatry, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yongin, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4048-203X
Jin Young ParkDepartment of Psychiatry, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yongin, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5351-9549

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite increased awareness and improved access to care, depression remains underrecognized and undertreated, in part due to limitations in how current assessment tools capture emotional distress. Traditional depression scales often rely on fixed diagnostic language and may overlook the varied and evolving ways in which individuals express depressive symptoms-particularly in digital environments. Social media platforms have emerged as important spaces where people articulate psychological suffering through informal, emotionally charged language. These expressions, while nonclinical in appearance, may hold meaningful diagnostic value.

objectiveThis study aimed to develop and validate the Depression Scale for Online Assessment (DSO), a tool designed to capture ecologically valid expressions of depressive symptoms as articulated in digital contexts.

methodsA cross-sectional, observational study was conducted with a community sample of 1216 adults, from which 1151 valid responses were retained for analysis. The scale's items were developed based on expert reviews and social media research. To identify the factor structure, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on a randomly selected half of the sample (n=575), followed by confirmatory factor analysis on the remaining half (n=576) to validate the model. Internal consistency was assessed following the EFA, and convergent validity was examined by correlating each DSO factor score with established depression measures, including the Korean version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale-Revised and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9.

resultsEFA identified a 5-factor structure (ie, social disconnection, suicide risk, depressed mood, negative self-concept, and cognitive and somatic distress) that explained 66.53% of the total variance, indicating an acceptable level of explanatory power for a multidimensional psychological construct. confirmatory factor analysis indicated acceptable model fit (χ²

conclusionsThe DSO is a psychometrically sound and clinically relevant tool that captures both core and emerging expressions of depression. Its digital adaptability makes it especially useful for research and clinical practice in mobile and remote care settings.

Indexed as

DepressionInternetPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsSocial MediaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultDepression Scale for Online Assessmentdepressive disorderdigital mental healthmobile phonescale developmentsocial media

Identifiers

PMID40690289
PMCPMC12337799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.