Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40690219›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Estimated Out-of-Pocket Costs for Patients With Common Cancers and Private Insurance.

Liam Rose, Ganesh Rajasekar, Anjali Nambiar, Alexa Pohl, Kathryn J Ruddy, Katherine Arnow, Manali Patel, Arden M Morris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Liam RoseStanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Ganesh RajasekarDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Anjali NambiarDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Alexa PohlDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Kathryn J RuddyDivision of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Katherine ArnowDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Manali PatelDivision of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Arden M MorrisDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Cancer imposes a substantial economic burden on patients that may be worse in patients with higher-stage disease due to the need for more therapy. Objective: To investigate the out-of-pocket costs (OOPCs) attributable to the initial treatment of common cancers among privately insured individuals diagnosed at different stages. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used administrative claims data of a large national insurer in the US linked to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry to compare OOPCs of individuals diagnosed with breast, colorectal, and lung cancer at different stages with OOPCs of similar individuals without cancer using difference-in-differences methods. Individuals living in the US between 2008 and 2022, aged younger than 65 years, insured through a large national private health insurer, and with 6 or more months of continuous enrollment were included. Data were analyzed from June 2024 through February 2025. Exposure: The presence or absence of an incident cancer diagnosis and disease stage from the SEER registry diagnosed from 2008 to 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was OOPCs among individuals with breast, colorectal, and lung cancer diagnosed at different disease stages compared with those with no cancer diagnosis. Results: The cohort consisted of 46 158 patients (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 46 [12] years; 30 733 female [66.6%]; 2543 Asian [5.5%], 4114 Black [8.9%], 3590 Hispanic [7.8%], and 31 099 White [67.4%]), including 19 656 patients with cancer and 26 502 patients without cancer in the control group. Among patients with cancer, 14 581 patients had breast cancer, 2842 patients had colorectal cancer, and 2233 patients had lung cancer. An incident cancer diagnosis was associated with a mean increase in OOPCs of $592.53 per month (95% CI, $528.01-$627.04 per month) for the 6 months after the diagnosis. Cost monotonically increased with stage at diagnosis (mean OOPC increase range, $462.01 per month [95% CI, $417.92-$506.11 per month] for stage 0 to $719.97 per month [95% CI, $626.11-$813.83 per month] for stage 4). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study of individuals with private insurance, patients faced high OOPCs after an incident diagnosis of cancer, with patients with more advanced cancer having the highest OOPCs. Further research is needed to determine the clinical and financial effects of increased OOPCs for patients with cancer.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresInsurance, HealthNeoplasmsAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSEER ProgramUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40690219
PMCPMC12281234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.