ArticleJAMA network open2025
Catheterization Method and Functional Recovery of Neurogenic Bladder in Spinal Cord Injury.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Danshen (Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Management of Urinary Retention in Older Women.Drugs & aging · 2026Review
- Complications and Risk Factors of Neurogenic Bladder: A Delphi Consensus.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Self-management challenges and psychosocial support needs in clean intermittent catheterization: a qualitative study of individuals with neurogenic bladder and caregivers.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Neurogenic bladder dysfunction affects up to 80% of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI), greatly impacting quality of life and health outcomes. Although current guidelines recommend intermittent catheterization primarily for infection prevention, its potential influence on recovery of volitional bladder control remains poorly understood. Objective: To determine whether intermittent catheterization, compared with indwelling catheterization, is associated with a higher likelihood of regaining volitional bladder control within 1 year after discharge in individuals with SCI, and to assess whether observed benefits are specific to bladder function or attributable to general neurological improvement. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used prospectively collected data from rehabilitation centers affiliated with the National Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems, representing diverse clinical settings across the US (2011-2021). Participants were adults (≥18 years) with traumatic SCI discharged with either indwelling or intermittent catheterization as primary bladder management. Data analysis was performed in October 2024. Exposure: Bladder management method at discharge (intermittent vs indwelling catheterization). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was recovery of volitional bladder control at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included improvements in sacral motor and sensory function to assess the specificity of any observed benefits to bladder function. Propensity score matching was used to minimize selection bias. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for outcomes. Results: Among 1032 matched participants (median [IQR] age, 42 [27-58] years; 815 male [79.0%]), intermittent catheterization was associated with a higher rate of bladder control recovery than indwelling catheterization (88 patients [17.1%] vs 60 patients [11.6%]). After adjusting for matched covariates, intermittent catheterization was associated with significantly higher odds of bladder recovery (aOR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.39-3.22; P < .001). No significant differences were observed for improvements in sacral motor function (120 patients [23.3%] vs 116 patients [22.4%]; aOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.59-1.90; P = .85) or sacral sensory function (127 patients [24.6%] vs 144 patients [27.9%]; aOR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.43-1.37; P = .38), suggesting that the observed difference was specific to bladder function rather than general neurological recovery. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with traumatic SCI, intermittent catheterization was independently associated with significantly higher odds of regaining volitional bladder control after SCI compared with indwelling catheterization, providing further evidence to support the prioritization of intermittent catheterization in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.