ArticleJAMA network open2025
Derivation of a 3-Item Patient Health Questionnaire as a Shortened Survey to Capture Depressive Symptoms.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Illness acceptance and early self-management in older adults with prediabetes: the mediating role of depression.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Threshold effect of visceral adiposity index on suicidal ideation: a mediation analysis through fasting blood glucose.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Screening measures of depressive symptoms (eg, 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]) are increasingly used in surveys and remote applications, where shorter versions would be valuable. Objective: To derive shorter versions of the PHQ-9 that maximize the variability in total depressive symptom severity captured. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study used data from 4 waves of a 50-state nonprobability web-based survey conducted between November 2, 2023, and July 21, 2024. Survey respondents were aged 18 years or older. The first survey wave data were used to identify shortened question subsets capturing variance in the PHQ-9 and estimating a PHQ-9 score of 10 or higher. Resulting models (eg, 3-item version of the PHQ [PHQ-3]) were validated in subsequent survey waves. Main Outcome and Measure: Performance of PHQ-3 in the full sample and across subgroups of age, gender, race and ethnicity, and educational levels. Depressive symptom severity was measured with the PHQ-9 (total score range: 0-27, with a score ≥10 indicating moderate or greater depressive symptoms). Results: In the 4 survey waves, there were 96 234 total participants (mean [SD] age, 47.3 [17.1] years; 55 245 [57.4%] identifying as women). In the full sample, 4401 participants (4.6%) identified as Asian American, 12 699 (13.2%) as Black or African American, 9776 (10.2%) as Hispanic or Latino, and 65 309 (67.9%) as White individuals, with 4049 (4.2%) who identified as having other race or ethnicity. Among these participants, the mean (SD) PHQ-9 score was 6.5 (6.6), and 25 411 (26.4%) met the criteria for moderate or greater depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 score ≥10). The optimal 3-item version, PHQ-3, used items 2 (subject: depressed mood), 6 (self-esteem or failure), and 1 (interest), yielding a Cronbach α of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.88-0.88) and Pearson correlation with the PHQ-9 total score of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.93-0.94). At a threshold of 3 or greater, the PHQ-3 sensitivity was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97-0.98) and specificity was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.75-0.76) for moderate or greater depressive symptoms. Performance was consistent across sociodemographic subgroups and survey waves. Conclusions and Relevance: This survey study of US adults identified a 3-item scale that remained highly correlated with the full PHQ-9 instrument. The reduced set of questions could enable more widespread and efficient incorporation of depressive symptom measurement in general population samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.