ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2025
Prediction model for the selection of patients with glioma to proton therapy.
Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Survival, late toxicity and ability to return to work after proton radiotherapy for low-grade gliomas.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe selection of patients with low-grade gliomas for proton therapy (PT) is often based on the comparison of photon and PT plans and demonstrating meaningful dose reduction to the healthy brain or critical structures. The aim of this retrospective study was to identify clinical parameters associated with referral to PT and build a prediction model. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe dataset consisted of patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant grades 2 and 3 glioma and candidates for PT at the Aarhus University Hospital. Clinical (age, diagnosis, clinical target volume [CTV], and treatment) and dosimetric (prescribed dose and mean dose (Dmean) to healthy brain) parameters were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess the association with selection for PT. The dataset was split into training (n = 37, period 2019-2022) and test (n = 12, period 2023) cohorts. Prediction models were built using logistic regression algorithms and support vector machines (SVMs) and evaluated using the area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PR).
resultsAge (p = 0.03) and CTV (p = 0.01) were significantly associated with the selection for PT and were used for model prediction. The logistic regression demonstrated AUC-PR at 0.999 (CI 0.999-1.000) and 0.998 (0.996-1.000) for training and test cohorts, respectively. SVM showed similar results with AUC-PR at 0.993 (0.993-0.994) for training and 0.999 (0.998-1.000) for test cohorts.
interpretationLogistic regression and SVM using age and CTV performed equally well and achieved a very high positive predictive value. With the pending external validation in a larger dataset, the prospects of this work suggest more consistent and efficient patient referral for PT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.