ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2025
Automatic measuring of coronary atherosclerosis from medicolegal autopsy photographs based on deep learning techniques.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Critical appraisal on "automatic measuring of coronary atherosclerosis from medicolegal autopsy photographs based on deep learning techniques".Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A diagnosis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is critical importance in forensic medicine, particularly because severe atherosclerosis is known to be associated with a high risk of sudden death. In South Korea, the assessment of coronary atherosclerosis during autopsy largely depends on the forensic pathologist's visual measurements, which may limit diagnostic accuracy. The objective of this study was to develop a deep learning algorithm for rapid and precise assessment of coronary atherosclerosis and to identify factors influencing the model's prediction of atherosclerosis severity. A total of 3,717 digital photographs were retrospectively extracted from a database of 1,920 forensic autopsies, with one image each selected for the left anterior descending coronary artery and the right coronary artery. The deep learning algorithm developed in this study demonstrated a high level of agreement (0.988, 95% CI: 0.985-0.990) and absolute agreement (0.986, 95% CI: 0.978-0.991) between predicted and ground truth atherosclerosis values on the test set. The model demonstrated strong overall performance on the test set, achieving a weighted F1-score of 0.904. However, the class-wise F1-scores were 0.957 for mild, 0.785 for moderate, and 0.876 for severe grades, indicating that performance was lowest for the moderate grade. Additionally, decomposition, stent implantation, and thrombi did not have a statistically significant impact on coronary atherosclerosis assessment except for calcification. Although enhancing model performance for moderate grades remains a challenge, this study's findings demonstrate the potential of artificial intelligence as a practical tool for assessing coronary atherosclerosis in autopsy photographs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40690102What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.