Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40690100›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2025

Efficacy of cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and risk factors for residual extravesical disease in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: insights from a nationwide cohort.

Ryoichi Saito, Rikiya Taoka, Jun Miki, Wataru Fukuokaya, Yoshiyuki Matsui, Shingo Hatakeyama, Takashi Kawahara, Ayumu Matsuda, Taketo Kawai, Tomokazu Sazuka and 31 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

41 authors.

Ryoichi SaitoDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan. rsaito@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3163-8723
Rikiya TaokaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan.
Jun MikiDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Wataru FukuokayaDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiyuki MatsuiDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shingo HatakeyamaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori, Japan.
Takashi KawaharaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Ayumu MatsudaDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Taketo KawaiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomokazu SazukaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Minoru KatoDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.
Takeshi SanoDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan.
Fumihiko UrabeDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Soki KashimaDepartment of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Hirohito NaitoDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan.
Yoji MurakamiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Life Science, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Makito MiyakeDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Kei DaizumotoDepartment of Urology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Yuto MatsushitaDepartment of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.
Takuji HayashiDepartment of Urology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Junichi InokuchiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yusuke SuginoDepartment of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan.
Kenichiro ShigaDepartment of Urology, Harasanshin General Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Noriya YamaguchiDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan.
Shingo YamamotoDepartment of Urology, Hyogo Medical University, Hyogo, Japan.
Keiji YasueDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashige AbeDepartment of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan.
Shotaro NakanishiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Ginowan, Japan.
Katsuyoshi HashineDepartment of Urology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Ehime, Japan.
Masato FujiiDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan.
Kiyoaki NishiharaDepartment of Urology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hiroaki MatsumotoDepartment of Urology Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Shuichi TataranoDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan.
Koichiro WadaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Shimane, Japan.
Sho SekitoDepartment of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan.
Ryo MaruyamaDepartment of Urology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Naotaka NishiyamaDepartment of Urology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medicine, Niigata, Japan.
Hiroyuki NishiyamaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Hiroshi KitamuraDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Hidefumi KinoshitaDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan.
Japan Urological Oncology Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) improves survival in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) as long as disease progression does not occur during treatment. However, predictors of NAC sensitivity remain elusive in clinical practice. This study evaluated the efficacy of NAC followed by radical cystectomy (NAC-RC) in cStage II-IIIA MIBC and identified the risk factors associated with residual extravesical disease.

methodsClinical data from 1474 patients who underwent radical cystectomy for cStage II-IIIA urothelial carcinoma were collected from 36 institutions of the Japanese Urological Oncology Group. Overall survival (OS) and non-urinary tract recurrence-free survival (NUT-RFS) were compared between the NAC-RC and upfront RC groups using the Kaplan-Meier method adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting. Logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for RED.

resultsPathological complete response (pT0N0) was achieved in 33.1 and 20.2% of cStage II and IIIA patients in the NAC-RC group, respectively, compared with 16.3 and 4.5% in the RC group. NAC significantly improved the OS and NUT-RFS in the IPTW-adjusted cohort. BCG-unresponsiveness, low serum albumin levels, and a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were independent predictors of RED in the NAC-RC cohort. Squamous differentiation was associated with worse prognosis but a favorable response to NAC in some tumors.

conclusionsCisplatin-based NAC improves outcomes in patients with cStage II-IIIA MIBC, including some tumors with squamous differentiation; however, its benefits may be limited in BCG-unresponsive cases. Given the biological heterogeneity of urothelial cancer, individualized treatment planning that integrates biological features and treatment history is needed for patients with MIBC.

Indexed as

CisplatinUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAgedCohort StudiesCystectomyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm, ResidualRisk FactorsCisplatinBCG unresponsiveChemosensitivityMuscle-invasive bladder cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyResidual Extravesical DiseaseSquamous differentiation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.