Article3D printing in medicine2025
Segmentation and finite element analysis in orthopaedic trauma.
Article in 3D printing in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-Dimensional Printing in Pediatric Orthopaedics: Cost Analysis and Emerging Applications.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026Review
- Effect of intramedullary nail length on the biomechanical performance of internal fixation for subtrochanteric femoral fractures.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Can FEM-based preoperative planning for complex tibial plateau fractures improve surgical skills? A cadaver study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Comparative finite element analysis of a novel distal tibiofibular locking plate versus conventional fixation methods for Tillaux-Chaput fractures.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Review
- 320 mm InterTan nail optimizes biomechanics in AO/OTA 31A2.3 fractures: superior stress distribution, micromotion, and strain for enhanced healing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFinite Element Analysis (FEA) has evolved into a crucial tool in orthopaedic trauma research and clinical practice. This review explores the broad applications of FEA in orthopedic surgery. MAIN BODY: FEA involves several steps, including geometry representation, segmentation, 3D rendering, meshing, material property assignment, defining boundary conditions, and specifying contact conditions. The process utilizes patient-specific volumetric data-computed tomography (CT) scan, for example-and aims for a balance between computational efficiency and accuracy. FEA provides valuable outcome measures such as stress distribution, strain quantification, fracture gap motion, failure prediction, and implant stability. These measures aid in evaluating fracture fixation techniques, implant design, and the impact of different fixation strategies. FEA has found applications in femur and proximal humerus fracture fixation, distal femur fracture planning, tibial plateau fractures, and post-traumatic osteoarthritis. It plays a pivotal role in predicting fracture risk, assessing construct stability, and informing surgical decision-making. Additionally, FEA facilitates the development of custom surgical planning and personalized implants. To enhance accuracy, FEA is combined with cadaveric biomechanical analysis, providing a reference-standard representation of in vivo kinematics. Future research should focus on refining FEA models through increased validation using cadaveric models and clinical data.
conclusionFEA has revolutionized orthopaedic trauma research by offering insights into biomechanics, fracture fixation, and implant design. Integration with cadaveric biomechanical analysis enhances accuracy. Further validation efforts and integration into regular clinical practice are essential for realizing FEA's full potential in individualized patient care. The combination of FEA and cadaveric analysis contributes to a comprehensive understanding of in vivo kinematics, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.