Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40690045›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

Exploring awareness, perceptions, and practices relating to nutritional status and low muscle mass in patients with ovarian cancer.

Sarah Benna-Doyle, Nicole Kiss, Erin Laing, Jenelle Loeliger, Brenton J Baguley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Addressing Malnutrition in Australian Hospitals: A Scoping Review to Inform Systems Thinking.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah Benna-DoyleInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia. sbennadoyle@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5158-3855
Nicole KissInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6476-9834
Erin LaingSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1296-6948
Jenelle LoeligerInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4423-109X
Brenton J BaguleyInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3974-8107

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWomen with ovarian cancer are at high risk of malnutrition and muscle loss due to advanced-stage diagnosis and treatment toxicities. Evidence-based guidelines recommend screening for malnutrition and sarcopenia to prevent associated adverse consequences, including reduced survival. This study aimed to describe awareness and perceptions of nutrition-related issues and practices in ovarian cancer among Australian healthcare professionals.

methodsA national survey was completed between November 2023 and March 2024. The 24-item survey evaluated awareness and perceptions of nutrition-related issues, screening and referral practices for malnutrition and sarcopenia at specific timepoints (from diagnosis, during, and/or post-treatment) and barriers to nutrition care in ovarian cancer.

resultsProfessionals (n = 57) were predominantly nurses (39%), dietitians (23%), or surgeons (19%). The most reported nutrition-related issues at diagnosis were weight loss (67%), overweight/obesity (54%), and sarcopenia (44%). During treatment, weight loss (70%) and sarcopenia (65%) were prominent, while post-treatment, weight gain (46%) and sarcopenia (39%) were most reported. The perceived clinical importance of malnutrition and sarcopenia varied according to professional discipline. Professionals identified chemotherapy as the treatment with the highest nutrition risk (97%), and 75% reported observing self-initiated dietary changes during treatment, yet 18% indicated their health services did not screen for nutrition risk, and 58% did not screen for sarcopenia. Key barriers were lack of established processes for sarcopenia screening (75%), limited dietetic services (60%), and lack of specific referral pathways (58%).

conclusionThe perceived importance of malnutrition and sarcopenia in ovarian cancer varies according to professional discipline despite robust evidence of the importance to clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelMalnutritionNutritional StatusOvarian NeoplasmsSarcopeniaAdultAustraliaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesWeight LossMalnutritionNutritionOvarian cancerSarcopeniaScreening

Identifiers

PMID40690045
PMCPMC12279610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.