ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Organ-specific effects of curcumin on favipiravir-induced oxidative stress: renal benefit and hepatic risk.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fa vipiravir (FAV), an antiviral for influenza and COVID-19, can provoke hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity. Curcumin (CUR) has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties that may protect against FAV-induced toxicity. Despite the widespread clinical use of FAV, to our knowledge, no in vivo animal study has yet examined its organ-specific oxidative injury profile in parallel with the putative dual, organ-directed actions of CUR. This study evaluated whether curcumin can mitigate favipiravir-induced oxidative and apoptotic damage in rat liver and kidney. Male Wistar rats received FAV (100 mg/kg i.p.) and CUR (100 or 200 mg/kg p.o.) for 14 days. Serum biochemistry analysis was performed to assess levels of ALT, AST, IL-6, MDA, TNF-α, and GSH. Additionally, histopathological examination and TUNEL assay were conducted on kidney and liver tissues. ALT, AST, and cytokines did not differ among groups. MDA remained unchanged in the FAV-alone group but rose significantly with CUR co-treatment, signifying CUR-driven amplification of oxidative stress, especially in hepatic tissue. Histopathological analysis revealed liver and kidney damage from FAV, with CUR exacerbating liver damage but offering partial protection to kidney structures. The TUNEL assay showed reduced apoptosis in the kidneys with CUR, especially at higher doses. FAV causes sub-clinical liver and kidney injury that is not accompanied by lipid peroxidation or enzyme leakage at 14 days. CUR exerts dual actions-mitigating renal apoptosis yet amplifying hepatic lipid peroxidation-highlighting an organ-specific risk-benefit ratio that should be weighed before empirical antioxidant supplementation during FAV therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40690012What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.