Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40690010›Full record

Trial reportNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026

A comparison of the effectiveness of lacosamide and pregabalin in treating patients diagnosed with neuropathic pain: a randomized, controlled, open-label pilot trial.

R Kalpana, W S Robert, Fatema Juzerehaji, Ramesh Venkatachalapathy, M Jagadeesan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R KalpanaDepartment of Neurology, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, 603203, Tamil Nadu, Chengalpattu, India.
W S RobertDepartment of Neurology, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, 603203, Tamil Nadu, Chengalpattu, India.
Fatema JuzerehajiDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, SRM College of Pharmacy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, 603203, Tamil Nadu, Chengalpattu, India.
Ramesh VenkatachalapathyDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, SRM College of Pharmacy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, 603203, Tamil Nadu, Chengalpattu, India.
M JagadeesanDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, SRM College of Pharmacy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, 603203, Tamil Nadu, Chengalpattu, India. jagapharmd2013@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic neuropathic pain is characterized by complex pathophysiology, and its treatment is associated with significant healthcare costs and resources. Controlling pain intensity remains challenging, necessitating alternative therapeutic approaches. Lacosamide and pregabalin have shown efficacy in neuropathic pain management, but comparative studies, particularly in the Indian population, are limited. A prospective, open-label, randomized controlled, parallel-arm pilot study was conducted on patients of either gender > 18 years of age with definite or probable neuropathic pain lasting beyond three months. Of 72 screened patients, 36 were randomized to receive either lacosamide (50 mg BD P/O for 1 week, then 100 mg BD P/O for 3 months) or pregabalin (75 mg OD P/O for 3 months). Analgesic efficacy was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and quality of life was evaluated with the SF-36 Questionnaire. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were assessed using the Naranjo Algorithm. SPSS software version 16.0 was used for statistical analysis, with p-values < 0.05 considered significant. Of 72 screened patients, 36 were randomized, and 7 dropped out, leaving 15 in the pregabalin group and 14 in the lacosamide group. The mean age was 52 years, and the mean BMI was 24 kg/m

Indexed as

AnalgesicsLacosamideNeuralgiaPregabalinAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAnalgesicsLacosamidePregabalinAnalgesic efficacyChronic neuropathic painLacosamideNumeric Rating Scale (NRS)Pregabalin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.