ReviewJournal of neurology2025
The heart-brain axis: neurocognitive frailty in heart failure.
Review in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence and associated factors of cognitive frailty in older adults with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Practices and barriers in screening for cognitive impairment in heart failure: a clinician survey.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Networked Pathological Mechanisms of Central Sympathetic Nervous System Regulation in Heart Failure and Novel Paradigms for Targeted Intervention.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Brain age gap as biomarker linking cardiovascular diseases genetic susceptibility and causality.iScience · 2026Article
- The latest research progress of ligustilide in the prevention and treatment of central nervous system disorders.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Analysis of factors associated with cognitive impairment in elderly patients hospitalized with chronic heart failure.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) and neurocognitive frailty (NCF) represent an increasingly recognized clinical intersection with profound implications for patient outcomes. Recent epidemiological data reveal that 40-60% of HF patients experience cognitive impairment, with prevalence increasing proportionally with disease severity. This cognitive-functional decline manifests as structural brain abnormalities, deficits in multiple cognitive domains, and reduced physical capabilities, collectively compromising self-care, increasing healthcare utilization, and elevating mortality risk by up to twofold. This comprehensive review examines the complex bidirectional relationship between HF and NCF, synthesizing current evidence on pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical assessment approaches, and management strategies. The pathophysiology involves interrelated processes, including cerebral hypoperfusion, blood-brain barrier disruption, neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and neurohumoral dysregulation-all contributing to accelerated brain aging and functional decline. Clinical assessment requires a multidimensional approach utilizing validated cognitive and frailty tools, biomarkers, neuroimaging, and functional measures. Management necessitates integrated strategies spanning optimized pharmacotherapy, device-based interventions, cognitive rehabilitation, structured exercise, nutritional support, and coordinated multidisciplinary care. Emerging evidence suggests that early intervention may attenuate cognitive decline and improve outcomes. As the prevalence of both conditions continues to rise, future research directions should focus on standardized assessment protocols, novel therapeutic targets, and innovative care delivery models to address this challenging clinical syndrome and improve quality of life for this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40690005What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.