ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Imaging of perineal suppurations: a pictorial essay.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perineal suppuration encompasses a broad spectrum of pathologies involving the anatomically complex perineal region. While anal fistula, with or without abscess, is the most frequent cause, infections may also originate from the skin, accessory urinary or genital glands, pelvic and perineal implants, or supralevator digestive structures. Clinical presentations range from benign acute episodes to severe life-threatening conditions or chronic relapsing infections. Diagnosis is often challenging due to overlapping symptoms and variable anatomical involvement. Imaging plays a pivotal role in delineating the extent and origin of disease, particularly in distinguishing anal from extra-anal sources, an essential step for appropriate management. Ultrasonography (US) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are well suited for evaluating anal fistulas; MRI is preferred for chronic, recurrent, or deep-seated infections, particularly those of cutaneous origin or associated with implant infection, while Computed tomography (CT) is favored for supralevator digestive involvement and Fournier's gangrene. A detailed understanding of perineal anatomy and its imaging correlates is crucial for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning. This pictorial essay illustrates the imaging features of perineal suppurations from diverse etiologies, emphasizing the diagnostic value of cross-sectional imaging and the central role of radiology in clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40689952What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.