ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2025
Pregnancy Outcomes in Epilepsy Patients Treated with Neuromodulating Devices.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewNeuromodulation provides additional treatment options for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who are not candidates or unwilling to undergo resective or ablative surgery. However, our current knowledge on the safety and efficacy of different neuromodulating devices during pregnancy is limited. This article reviews recent research on pregnancy outcomes in epilepsy patients treated with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), or responsive neurostimulation (RNS). RECENT
findingsCurrently available information about pregnancy outcomes in epilepsy patients with neuromodulating devices all comes from cases series or case reports. Randomized control trials or prospective observational studies are lacking in this patient population. The overall sample size is too small to draw conclusions on the safety of these neuromodulating devices in pregnancy and maternal outcomes including obstetric complications. There is no clear sign of device-related teratogenicity. Further research should be directed at establishing a pregnancy registry and conducting multi-center prospective studies to track pregnancy outcomes in epilepsy patients with various neuromodulating devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40689941What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.