ArticleMolecular cancer research : MCR2025
Genomic Signatures of Poor Prognosis in Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Institution Prospective Study.
Article in Molecular cancer research : MCR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Virus infections and cancers: from mechanisms to therapeutics.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Challenges in the detection and assembly of virus integration structures in human genomes.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive disease with poor survival outcomes and increasing incidence. There is a clear and present need for enhanced understanding of cellular mechanisms of tumorigenesis, validation of robust genetic signatures predictive of aggressive disease, and novel informatics tools to simplify analysis of Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV)-host genome interactions. Genomic DNA was harvested from 54 MCC tumors for exome sequencing and in-depth genetic profiling of a 226-gene panel. We further developed a robust informatics package (MCPyViewer) optimized for MCPyV integration site analysis with graphical output to simplify usability for end users. Finally, we assessed the prognostic impact of specific genetic signatures on MCC-specific survival in our cohort. Our study included 54 patients (n = 44 MCPyV positive), 11 (20.4%) of whom had died of MCC at last follow-up. Human genes altered at high frequency included LRP1B (n = 10, 18.5%), FAT1 (n = 9, 16.7%), KMT2D (n = 9, 16.7%), and RB1 (n = 7, 13.0%). In 36 of 44 (81.8%) MCPyV-positive tumors, we identified viral integration into the human genome with a median of two events per tumor. In six tumors, MCPyV integrated into Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer tier 1 or tier 2 cancer-related human genes. IMPLICATIONS: A combined genomics score incorporating tumor mutational burden and copy-number variation was strongly prognostic of MCC-specific survival controlling for lymph node metastases and tumor MCPyV status; thus, our study adds critical understanding to prognostic markers and tumorigenic mechanisms in MCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.