ArticleEpilepsia2025
The impact of revised definitions on the epidemiology of status epilepticus: A population-based study.
Article in Epilepsia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potential Role of Mitochondria-Associated Endoplasmic Reticulum Membranes (MAMs) Abnormalities in Epileptogenesis: Multimodal Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Clinical outcomes and unmet therapeutic needs in new-onset refractory status epilepticus: evidence from a retrospective cohort.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Defining the end point of status epilepticus: A scoping review and framework for standardization.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- The impact of revised definitions on the epidemiology of status epilepticus: A population-based study.Epilepsia · 2025Article
- Treating status epilepticus in clinical practice-a multi-national survey in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Status epilepticus: the score question.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveStatus epilepticus (SE) represents one of the most common neurological emergencies. The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) redefined SE duration thresholds from 30 to 5 min for convulsive SE in 2015. We conducted a prospective population-based study to determine SE incidence and outcomes under the revised criteria and compared findings with historical data using the 30-min definition.
methodsA prospective, population-based cohort study was conducted over a period of 18 months to determine the incidence of SE in Germany, replicating the methodology of a first study conducted in this region in 1999. The study included all adults residing within the 35-postcode area, with participation from all regional hospitals and emergency departments. SE cases were prospectively identified and reported. To ensure comparability with the historical data, the analysis focused on the Primary Service Area (PS-Area)-the direct catchment region of the University Hospital Marburg.
resultsA total of 180 adults with SE (96 men, mean age 66.47 years, SD ± 18.5 years, range: 20-94 years). The crude annual incidence in the PS-Area increased from 15.8/100 000 (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.2-21.6) in 1999 to 29.4/100 000 adults (95% CI 20.5-40.0). It was higher in men than in women (30.9 vs 28.1/100 000, p = .11) and in patients ≥60 years (68.5 vs 13.5/100 000; p < .0001). The calculated age- and gender-adjusted incidence was 32.5/100 000 in the PS-Area. The case-fatality rate was 5.77% (95% CI 1.2%-12.7%) and the crude annual cause-specific mortality rate per 100 000 is 1.70 (95% CI 0.21-4.73). In 53% SE was the first seizure episode; only 47% had a history of epilepsy. When extrapolating these findings to the entire German population, there were at least 20 000 cases of SE with 1000 associated deaths annually. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings provide new epidemiologic evidence that the incidence of SE has increased by ~12% with the adoption of the ILAE 2015 definition, underscoring the impact of updated diagnostic criteria on epidemiological estimates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.