ArticleIntegrative zoology2026
Offensive and Defensive Exploitation of Ants by Termitophagous Spiders (Araneae: Zodariidae).
Article in Integrative zoology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Offensive and Defensive Exploitation of Ants by Termitophagous Spiders (Araneae: Zodariidae).Integrative zoology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myrmecophagy is one of the most common types of dietary specialization among predators. It can include exploitation of ants, termites, or both. Although ants and termites share a few traits, they are distantly related and possess different defensive mechanisms. Therefore, adaptations to ants and termites should differ, especially in arthropod predators of similar body size as their prey. We investigate offensive and defensive adaptations in Zodariidae spider genus Diores, reported to feed on termites. The ancestral state reconstruction of the diet favored termitophagy for the genus, but metabarcoding analyses revealed that only one of the four studied Diores species fed exclusively on termites. The remaining three species captured both ants and termites. Interestingly, the laboratory observations of a single species, Diores poweri, revealed a similar attack-and-retreat strategy to catch both termites and ants. Three ant species and one termite were successfully captured with a similar frequency, but the capture of Hodotermes termites was more efficient. The paralysis of Hodotermes by D. poweri was approximately 20 times faster than by an ant-eating spider Zodarion nitidum, which correspond to venom composition differences between the species. The habitus of D. poweri resembles the size, shape, movement, and the coloration of its predominant prey, Camponotus maculatus ants, suggesting Batesian mimicry. However, the modeling of the visual discrimination of coloration by potential lizard and bird predators revealed that Diores might be distinguished from Camponotus. Our results suggest that Diores spiders are specialized myrmeco-termitophagous predators, possessing effective adaptations and exploiting ants for defense.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.