ArticleJournal of vision2025
The racer's gaze: Visual strategy in high-speed sports expertise.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eye movements shape all visual input to the brain, making their understanding essential for studying perception and visual guidance in dynamic environments. Research on expert performance indicates that gaze coordination is a key feature of expertise in, for example, sports. Mobile eye tracking provides the opportunity to investigate gaze strategies supporting the skilled actions of an athlete and can deliver insight into the underlying perceptual-cognitive processes. We systematically observed the visual strategy of an expert racing driver performing a domain-representative task. Synchronized gaze, telemetry, and localization data from a high-grade simulator were analyzed to address four classes of research questions: oculomotor, scene analysis, timing, and point of vantage. The results (a) replicate the seminal tangent point orientation (pre-turn-in saccades), (b) describe both the oculomotor signature and timing signature of the steering with the head strategy, (c) identify a novel saccade strategy (pre-full-throttle saccades), and (d) reveal a previously unstudied spatial regularity in the serial organization of behavior: a tight localization of the points of vantage where the pre-turn-in saccades and pre-full-throttle saccades are made. The gaze strategies are not tied to specifics of the task and may be relevant for understanding expert performance in other fields with similar visuomotor and cognitive demands. The method of cross-examining an integrated dataset by multiple parametrizations itself complements traditional research designs with predefined task constraints and restrictions. We are not aware of any study that has simultaneously addressed all four kinds of research questions simultaneously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.