Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40689560›Full record

ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2025

Supporting self-managed abortion care in "practice not premise": a qualitative study of provider perspectives, roles, and information pathways to care in India.

Laura E Jacobson, Caila Brander, Balasubramanian Palanisamy, Sruthi Chandrasekaran, Blair G Darney, Julia M Goodman, Ruvani Jayaweera, Caitlin Gerdts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura E JacobsonAssistant Professor, Portland State University, OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Portland, OR, USA; Independent Consultant, Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0996-7408
Caila BranderSenior Research Manager, Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1274-1848
Balasubramanian PalanisamyExecutive Director, Rural Women's Social Education Centers (RUWSEC), Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0009-0000-8622-6593
Sruthi ChandrasekaranIndependent Consultant, Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7152-2752
Blair G DarneyAssociate Professor, OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Portland, OR, USA; Associate Professor, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Affiliate Professor, Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica (INSP), Centro de Investigacion en Salud Poblacional (CISP), Cuernavaca, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8120-028X
Julia M GoodmanAssociate Professor, OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9296-8697
Ruvani JayaweeraSenior Research Scientist, Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0609-9892
Caitlin GerdtsVice President of Research, Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2488-5072

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This qualitative study explored provider perspectives on self-managed abortion (SMA) in India, their roles, and how they share information about pathways to both clinician- and self-managed abortion care. We conducted 33 semi-structured interviews with a range of providers (medical, community health, and pharmacy) in three states in India: Jharkhand, Bihar, and Tamil Nadu. Using thematic analysis, we examined provider perspectives on SMA, their involvement in abortion care, and how they contribute to information sharing around access pathways. We categorised findings by provider type, direction of care pathways, abortion modality (clinician-managed vs. SMA), and the kind of care delivered. Our findings showed most providers described abortion as conditionally acceptable and primarily encouraged clinician-managed care. Concerns about SMA safety and potential liability often led them to discourage SMA. Nonetheless, participants acknowledged three areas where providers played a role in SMA: providing information, dispensing medication, and providing support (i.e. managing pain). Pharmacy workers and local providers shared information with abortion seekers on pathways to access SMA care. Some community health workers directed clients to pharmacies, but more often only provided SMA information and support. Despite provider concerns, support for and pathways to SMA exist in India. Understanding the dynamics of provider perspectives and roles can inform improvements to comprehensive reproductive health policies and programmes in order to promote person-centred abortion care - including SMA - and address provider concerns. Synergies are needed between the formal health sector and SMA support networks to advance person experiences and reinforce quality abortion care as a human right.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAttitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelSelf-ManagementAdultFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIndiaInterviews as TopicMalePregnancyProfessional RoleQualitative ResearchabortionIndiapharmacyquality of careself-managed abortion

Identifiers

PMID40689560
PMCPMC12351739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.