ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026
Pain Services in the Netherlands: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study on Organisation, Tasks and Responsibilities.
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of Current Pain Management in Total Knee Arthroplasty in 8 Tertiary Hospitals in China Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsProviding an overview of the organisation, tasks, and responsibilities of acute and transitional pain services in the Netherlands.
designCross-sectional questionnaire study.
methodsAn online questionnaire was sent to representatives of Dutch hospital pain services performing inpatient surgery. It included items on organisation, staffing, education, roles, tasks and responsibilities. Data were analysed descriptively.
resultsOf the surveyed hospitals, 92.2% reported having an acute pain service, while only 6.5% had a transitional pain service. Most pain services (acute pain services 76.3%, transitional pain services 80.0%) are part of the anaesthesiology department. Staffing includes anaesthesiologists, nurses, and/or nurse anaesthetists, with or without pain specialisation. Acute pain service teams monitor complex pain management techniques. Nearly all acute pain services (89.8%) provide pain management training, and 60% monitor hospital-wide pain management quality. All transitional pain services monitored opioid use post-discharge and conducted follow-up calls with patients.
conclusionsAcute pain services are well established in Dutch hospitals, whereas transitional pain services remain limited. Organisational structures, tasks, and responsibilities vary, with key challenges in staffing, service organisation, and education. Future research should focus on optimising staffing, expanding transitional pain services, the role of the pain nurse, and establishing a national pain management education framework. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE: This study highlights the significant impact of pain nurses as a central professional within the interdisciplinary team, contributing to quality care and education, ultimately benefiting patients. IMPACT: This study provides a current overview of pain services in the Netherlands, supporting pain nurses in innovating pain services, highlighting key challenges and opportunities for improvement. REPORTING
methodSTROBE checklist. PATIENT/PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: None.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.