Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40689490›Full record

Trial reportSexually transmitted diseases2025

Youth-Friendly Sexual Health Services and Peer Support for Improved Sexual and Reproductive Health Outcomes Among Adolescents and Young Adults in South Africa: Results of a Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jana Jarolimova, Jacob Busang, Natsayi Chimbindi, Nonhlanhla Okesola, Theresa Smit, Guy Harling, Nuala McGrath, Andrew Copas, Janet Seeley, Kathy Baisley and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jana JarolimovaFrom the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-6787-3012
Jacob BusangAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.
Natsayi Chimbindi
Nonhlanhla OkesolaAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.
Theresa SmitAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.
Guy Harling
Nuala McGrath
Andrew CopasUniversity College London, London, United Kingdom.
Janet Seeley
Kathy Baisley
Maryam ShahmaneshORCID 0000-0001-7129-8535
Isisekelo Research Group

Funding

Maximizing combination HIV prevention, uptake and retention by adolescent girls and young womenR01MH114560 · NIMH · KWAZULU-NATAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE TB-HIV · PI SHAHMANESH, MARYAM · 2017 to 2023
$2.0M
Mentoring in patient-oriented research on HIV prevention in the US and South AfricaK24AI141036 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Ingrid Valerie Bassett · 2019 to 2026
$1.1M
Screening strategies for sexually transmitted infections in a high HIV incidence setting in South AfricaK23AI174917 · NIAID · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI Jana Jarolimova · 2023 to 2026
$770k
Gates Foundation INV-033650NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI174917NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI141036NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114560Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescents and young adults in South Africa have high burdens of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and unintended pregnancy. We evaluated the impact of peer support and/or expanded sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services on STIs, contraception, and pregnancy in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

methodsWe analyzed secondary outcomes from a 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial conducted from March 2020 to August 2022 among 16- to 29-year-olds, comparing (1) enhanced standard of care (SoC), access to mobile youth-friendly HIV prevention (AYFS); (2) SRH, self-collected STI testing and referral to AYFS with expanded SRH services; (3) peer support, peer navigator facilitation of AYFS attendance; (4) SRH + peer support. At 12 months, all participants were offered STI testing; female participants self-reported contraceptive use and pregnancy.

resultsAmong 1743 trial participants (51% female), 927 (53%) had 12-month STI results; 209 (22.5%) tested positive: 163 (17.6%) chlamydia, 54 (5.8%) gonorrhea, and 44 (4.8%) trichomoniasis. The prevalence of STI was somewhat lower among those exposed to peer support (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] adjusted for sex, age, location, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.06) or SRH (aOR, 0.74; 0.56-1.06) and, compared with SoC, was reduced in those exposed to both (aOR, 0.59; 0.38-0.94). In SRH arms, 64 of 469 (13.6%) had a new STI at 12 months, with no difference by peer support ( P = 0.97). Among females, 336 of 634 (53.0%) reported using contraception and 47 of 667 (7.1%) reported pregnancy, with little difference by study arm.

conclusionsPeer support and STI testing with expanded SRH each had no more than small effects on STIs, contraception, or pregnancy. Combined or more intensive interventions, for example, repeat screening, enhanced partner notification, and deeper understanding of structural drivers, are needed.

Indexed as

Peer GroupReproductive HealthReproductive Health ServicesSexual HealthSexually Transmitted DiseasesSocial SupportAdolescentAdultContraceptionContraception BehaviorFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMalePregnancySexual Behavior

Identifiers

PMID40689490
PMCPMC12377691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.