ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2025
Development of a Quality Measure to Improve HIV and Syphilis Screening in the Emergency Department: A Modified Delphi Approach.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emergency Department Syphilis Screening: Insights from a National Stakeholder Convening.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Article
- Analysis of the spatio-temporal pattern and evolutionary trends of syphilis at township level in Xining City, Qinghai Province, China from 2008 to 2024.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emergency department (ED) screening is an important strategy to address the persistent human immunodefiency virus (HIV) epidemic; however, ED screening rates remain low. This study describes the development of a quality measure to improve screening rates for HIV among ED patients. A panel of 10 emergency physicians with expertise in ED-based preventive health and quality measurement employed a 3-round modified Delphi process. The panel reviewed peer-reviewed literature and national guidelines to identify high-risk patient populations; participated in anonymous surveys to rank ED screening approaches based on the impact and feasibility of measurement and practice; and discussed survey rankings in consensus discussions. The highest impact and most feasible group to target for quality measurement were ED patients already undergoing testing for other sexually transmitted infections (ie, "co-screening"). This study successfully designed a quality measure to improve coscreening for HIV in the ED. Implementing this measure could enhance detection and subsequent linkage to care, ultimately contributing to the control of these epidemics. The focus on combining screening for HIV with diagnostic testing for patients with signs and symptoms of sexually transmitted infection aligns with an emerging approach in health care settings that balances expected health impact with feasibility challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.