ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2025
Utilization and Determinants of Anticancer Drugs Under China's National Drug Price Negotiation Policy.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The Chinese government began to take national drug price negotiation (NDPN) in 2016, aiming to enhance the accessibility and affordability of anticancer drugs. This study aims to assess the utilization and influence factors of anticancer drugs under NDPN policy in China. Patients and Methods: Gastric cancer patients within chemotherapy were included. Independent variables were measured by age, gender, insurance type, total medical expenditure (THE), length of stay (LOS), drug-to-total-expense ratio (DTR). The primary outcomes were negotiated drugs usage, costs and treatment outcome. Two-part model was used to identify influence factors of anticancer drugs utilization. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was employed to evaluate the impact of negotiated drug utilization on treatment outcomes among inpatients. Results: The sample included 9868 gastric cancer patients from three cities. Outpatient patients demonstrated limited utilization of negotiated drugs (1.33%). Patients aged 61-75 (β=0.923, P < 0.01) and over 75 years (β=0.946, P < 0.05) were more likely to use negotiated drugs. Key factors influencing inpatient drug utilization included medical insurance type (β=-0.245, P<0.01), LOS (β=-0.122, P<0.001), and the DTR (=0.037, P<0.001). The use of negotiated drugs had no significant effect on treatment outcomes. Conclusion: Their limited utilization of negotiated drugs for outpatients arises an urgent necessity for more comprehensive insurance coverage, and the no significant outcome effect dedicated the importance to rigorously validate the effectiveness of these drugs with abundant real-world evidence in the foreseeable future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.