ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
App-based daily self-measurement of impedance in cochlear implant users.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrode impedance in cochlear implantation: determinants, dynamics, and clinical implications.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Review
- Regional analysis of impedance shifts in paediatric cochlear implantation: insights into early electrode-tissue interface dynamics.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Impedance telemetry measurements in cochlear implant (CI) recipients are commonly used to assess CI electrode functionality and provide valuable insights into inner ear conditions. However, these measurements usually take place only during surgery and at clinical follow-up appointments, offering limited temporal resolution of impedance changes. This study aimed to address this gap by implementing daily impedance monitoring using a smartphone app. Methods: A prospective study evaluated the usability of a research app for remote impedance measurements over 4 months following standard CI surgery with a MED-EL FLEX28 electrode. Impedance was recorded twice daily (morning and evening). The mean impedance across all electrode channels was analyzed for four postoperative time periods: early postoperative (up to day 10 postoperatively), late postoperative (from day 11 to ~4 weeks), intensive fitting (from ~4 weeks postoperatively to ~7 weeks) and regular hearing phase (from ~7 weeks to 4 months). Two CI fitting approaches were compared: activation during the early postoperative phase (early activation, EA) and activation during the intensive fitting phase (conventional activation, CA). Morning-to-evening differences in impedance (MED) were also examined. Results: The app demonstrated an overall usage rate of 66% ( Conclusion: Remote impedance measurements via the app can be made over an extended postoperative period. The increased measurement frequency allowed for detailed characterization of impedance dynamics, particularly around the onset of electrical stimulation. No clinically relevant difference in mean impedance was found between EA and CA groups. Daily fluctuations showed consistently lower evening values after stimulation onset. These findings highlight the potential value of this approach for enhancing postoperative CI management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.