ArticleMedical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)2025
Evaluating Children's Drawings as a Means of Expression in Children with Chronic Diseases.
Article in Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Children's drawings are considered an important tool for detecting emotions and experiences that a child may be unable or unwilling to express verbally. Objective: This study aimed to assess the emotional state, psychological development, and adjustment mechanisms of children with chronic diseases using projective drawing tests, and to compare their responses with those of healthy children. Methods: A cross-sectional design was implemented in one region of Greece, involving 100 children aged 6-12 years. The sample included 50 children with chronic diseases (25 with type 1 diabetes and 25 with cystic fibrosis) and 50 healthy children serving as a control group, selected from pediatric clinics and schools. Data collection took place between January and June 2023. Participants completed three projective tests: the Kinetic Family Drawing Test (KFD), Tree Drawing Test, and House Drawing Test, which assessed emotional expression and psychological functioning. Results: Children with chronic diseases expressed emotions differently compared to healthy peers. In the KFD, they depicted fewer smiling faces, indicating higher emotional distress and a more negative perception of their family environment. In the tree drawings, symbolic elements such as birds-representing freedom or hope - were more common among children with chronic diseases, while healthy children more often drew roots, suggesting emotional stability. The House Drawing Test revealed no significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion: Projective tests such as the KFD and Tree Drawing Test appear to be effective in identifying emotional issues in children with chronic illnesses, unlike the House Drawing Test. These findings support the integration of such tools into psychological assessments and therapeutic interventions for pediatric chronic disease populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.