Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40689267›Full record

ArticleInfectious Disease Modelling2025

Mathematical insights into mumps transmission control with optimal strategies.

Stephen Edward, Alberto Kimbuya Mathias

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious Disease Modelling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stephen EdwardDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Dodoma, Box 338, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Alberto Kimbuya MathiasDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Dodoma, Box 338, Dodoma, Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we develop an optimal control framework for managing mumps infections through a dynamic model that integrates public health interventions such as awareness programs, isolation protocols, and a two-dose immunization regimen. We begin by establishing the model's fundamental analytical properties, including the existence and stability of disease equilibria, the positivity and boundedness of solutions, and a threshold condition for disease transmission. Local stability analysis is conducted via the Routh-Hurwitz criteria, ensuring robust insights into the disease dynamics. The optimal control problem is formulated and analyzed using Pontryagin's Maximum Principle, which facilitates the derivation of optimal interventions. Numerical simulations are conducted to assess various control strategies and compare the effectiveness of single and combined interventions. Our results indicate that a balanced solution is key to effective disease mitigation. A comprehensive approach employing all four controls: awareness, isolation, primary and booster vaccination, is the most effective strategy. Moreover, strategies that incorporate vaccination consistently outperform those without. Interestingly, a three-control strategy closely approximates the effectiveness of the full four-control intervention, suggesting a cost-effective alternative for practical implementation. While the four-control strategy may incur higher implementation costs, the three-control strategy offers a balanced solution, achieving substantial disease reduction while optimizing resource allocation. Our findings underscore the crucial role of vaccination in mumps control. They offer valuable insights for policymakers, emphasizing the need to balance economic considerations with public health outcomes. Vaccination, as our study demonstrates, is a cornerstone of any effective mumps control strategy.

Indexed as

IsolationMumpsOptimal controlsPontrygin's maximum principleVaccination

Identifiers

PMID40689267
PMCPMC12272433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.