ArticleSAGE open medicine2025
Survival differences according to baseline characteristics of patient with advanced heart failure treated with levosimendan.
Article in SAGE open medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular associated biomarkers in adults with asymptomatic autoimmune diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: To assess whether baseline characteristics (age, New York Heart Association functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction, glomerular filtration rate, systolic blood pressure, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide) predicted different survival functions in patients with advanced heart failure, treated with intermittent inotropics. Methods: Survival analysis based on a retrospective cohort of patients with advanced heart failure, treated with intermittent infusion of levosimendan and managed at heart failure clinic of the Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, in Bogotá (Colombia). We evaluated which baseline characteristics were associated with worse survival outcomes, using Kaplan-Meier curves and log rank test. Results: Forty-two patients with advanced heart failure were included (mean age: 69.5 ± 13.2 years, 97.6% New York Heart Association III-IV, 54.7% of the population had quadruple therapy). A total of 39.5% died during 1-year follow-up. Survival functions were worse in patients with N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels >6000 pg/mL (HR: 2.72; 95% CI: 1.01-8.01, Conclusion: Our preliminary data suggest that the only characteristic that could predict worse survival in patients with advanced heart failure treated with levosimendan is N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels greater than 6000 pg/ml. Future research is needed to confirm our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.