Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40689194›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2025

Innovative use of squid (

Mohamad Fadjar, Hartmut Kühn, Ayu Winna Ramadhani, Diana Aisyah, Cucun Herlina, Rangga Idris Affandi, Jefri Anjaini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohamad FadjarDepartment of Fisheries and Water Resource Management, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.
Hartmut KühnDepartment of Biochemistry, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ayu Winna RamadhaniPSDKU Aquaculture, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.
Diana AisyahPSDKU Aquaculture, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.
Cucun HerlinaDepartment of Fisheries and Water Resource Management, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.
Rangga Idris AffandiDepartment of Fisheries and Marine Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia.
Jefri AnjainiDepartment of Fisheries, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, University of Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Infectious myonecrosis virus (IMNV) is a significant pathogen affecting Materials and Methods: A completely randomized design was employed, with five groups: a negative control (healthy shrimp), a positive control (IMNV-infected), and three treatment groups that received squid ink powder at 400, 500, and 600 mg/kg feed, respectively. The feed was administered before and after IMNV immersion challenge. Immune parameters assessed included total hemocyte count (THC), differential hemocyte count (DHC), respiratory burst (RB), phenoloxidase (PO), superoxide dismutase (SOD), phagocytic activity, and ribonucleotide reductase (RR) expression. Statistical analysis was conducted using a one-way analysis of variance with Duncan's Results: The 500 mg/kg dose of squid ink powder significantly enhanced shrimp immunity post-IMNV challenge. This treatment yielded the highest THC (6 × 10 Conclusion: Squid ink powder at 500 mg/kg feed significantly enhances the non-specific immune system in

Indexed as

aquaculture healthimmunostimulantinfectious myonecrosis virusLitopenaeus vannameinon-specific immune responsesquid ink powder

Identifiers

PMID40689194
PMCPMC12269958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.